Header Image

        MAR 1, 2017        

In This Issue
Greetings Dear Friends

This month's newsletter contains an announcement about my intention to start up a discussion group on global geopolitics, some info about a Jennis gig and a new article called Time Fields.

Back in Hanoi, a couple of months ago, my partner, Enza, and I had a stimulating conversation about the nature of Time. This led to some thoughts that, on our flight home, I wrote into a wee essay. Even though it's a tad longer than the usual writings that appear in these newsletters, I felt compelled to share it. I invite anyone who may have their own thoughts on the matter to reply to this email and share them with me.

If you'd like to access past newsletters containing articles on the Big Shift, the Physics of Mysticism, Magic, the Power of Mantra, Conciousness and other topics, please visit the 'newsletter' page of my website: 


Peace and love, Dennis.
by Dennis Gaumond 
What if someone assassinated Elvis? What if this happened before he got to revolutionize pop music by being the first attractive white male to sing like an Afro-American blues artist? Would rock and roll not have been popularized? Or maybe the process would have taken much longer? Or what if Hitler had been assassinated before his charisma got a chance to popularize the Nazi movement?
Consider the idea that someday mankind will develop the technology to time travel. There are several sci-fi movies and stories that have explored this theme. They are based on the notion that we could send missions into the past to undo events that dramatically changed the course of history. What if we could stop certain personalities from contributing what they contributed, preventing them from affecting us the way they did?
As entertaining as such imaginings may be, I have my doubts that it would work that way. I don't doubt that someday we may indeed be able to time travel. What I have a hard time with is the popular definition of time itself. The average person visualizes time unfolding in a constant, linear manner, with one event following another in a cause/effect relationship. From that perspective it is easy to imagine that, if we could prevent a certain event from taking place, we could indeed change the course of history.
But what if our reality doesn't work that way at all? What if our 'common sense' interpretation of the way time unfolds is completely wrong? Allow me to propose an alternative vision that may be a little closer to the actual truth, while admitting that the actual truth is probably far beyond our capacity to fully understand.
Most of us, at some point during our high-school education, were introduced to the concept of a force field - the idea that energy can exist in a way that influences whatever is within its field to behave a certain way. There are gravitational, electro-magnetic and atomic fields, etc. Such a field is a 'condition', a template that has a predictable effect on whatever may take place within its sphere of influence. We don't know what causes such an energy field. This is because we don't really know what energy is, we only know what it does.
During some science class, most of us were shown that, if we place magnets under a metal tray, we would create a magnetic field. If we then threw a handful of iron filings onto the tray, they would arrange themselves in a predictable pattern. If we removed some of the filings, the remaining filings would re-arrange themselves so that the pattern prevailed. If all the filings were removed and a new handful of filings were thrown onto the tray, the same pattern would form. In other words, the condition for the pattern is already there - like a template - determining the arrangement of the filings.
There's a little known branch of science called 'cymatics' - developed by Ernst Chladniand Hans Jenny. They developed experiments that showed how sound can affect matter. I'll offer an oversimplified description of their work. A metal tray was placed on an electronic speaker and then a quantity of sand was placed on the tray. A musical note was then played through the speaker. The vibration of the note caused the grains of sand to arrange themselves in a specific pattern. A particular note always caused the same pattern. If the note was changed, it would produce a different pattern - the higher the pitch of the note, the more complex the pattern.
There's a passage in the Bible that says, " In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." There's also a passage in the Hindu Vedas that is almost identical. It is alluding to the notion that 'the word', which is another way of saying 'sound', is what shapes matter. In other words, vibrating energy - which is what causes 'sound' - is like a type of force field that determines the way that the particles that make up our physical reality arrange themselves. There are many mystical writings that say similar things.
In the modern era, science has also questioned our ideas of reality. Our common sense perception of matter, for example, does not stand up to quantum testing. Matter, as we perceive it, is pretty much an illusion, as the mystics have always said. Matter is not really solid, as we perceive it to be. Science suggests that it seems to be made up of empty space. If an atom were the size of a football field, the nucleus would be the size of a tomato seed in the centre of the field, with electrons the size of grains of salt orbiting at ferocious speeds at the perimeter of the field. Furthermore, if we enlarged the nucleus to the same football field size, it would consist of even smaller particles whipping around at even greater speeds.
The particles that make up an atom are held in place by an atomic field. The atoms that make up a molecule are held in place by a magnetic field. The cosmic bodies that make up the physical universe are held in place by gravitational fields. What's even more astounding is that science now sees the smallest particles as energy fields unto themselves. So, an atom is all empty space. As Einstein suggested with his famous equation, E=MC2, matter seems to be equivalent to energy.
Similar to the pattern formed by the iron filings or the sand on the vibrating tray, our reality is a pattern shaped by underlying energy fields. Just like our physical, five-sensory perception of matter, our notions of time as a progression of events in a cause-effect relationship - also a five-sensory perception - may be equally inadequate. Einstein and others have demonstrated that time does not flow in a constant, predictable manner. They have shown that there are many factors and circumstances that affect the flow of time.
Having exposed myself to much information regarding the nature of reality, both from a scientific and a mystical/metaphysical perspective, I'd like to present a model of the concept of time that makes more sense to me. Imagine that, just as there are energy fields, there are also time fields. In an energy field, matter is affected by the force within the field - i.e., the metal filings are pushed into certain patterns that are determined by the field. What if 'time fields' had a similar effect on events? What if time fields determined the pattern of events.
Of course, to most of us this sounds pretty 'out there'. In our mind's eye we can't help but see the world according to the information provided by our five senses. But both science and metaphysics have suggested that matter is not what it seems. The same is true of time. Some of the questions that tease us are, what causes an energy field? Or even more profound, what is energy? What is time?
The mystics tell us that every aspect of our reality is a different manifestation of energy. This is hard to understand as it applies to solid matter, but is even harder to grasp as it applies to such intangibles as thoughts, feelings and the flow of time. The latest developments in physics seem to be in agreement with ever more of this mystical information. There are hints that it may be in accord with an even more profound concept, the idea that energy is equivalent to consciousness. So the sum-total of all consciousness is what constitutes energy, which in turn shapes every aspect of our reality.
If this is true, then it implies that consciousness also creates the field that shapes the unfolding of events. Could it be that the 'event pattern' determined by the time field is such that, if a certain event failed to happen, some other event would happen that would achieve the same result? In other words, a new circumstance in our reality was destined to happen.
This is reminiscent of the classical philosophical debate - is our fate predetermined or do we have free will? With this model of the nature of time, it seems that both are true. At first glance it seems that if events occur according to a predetermined template, then we really have no free will. But our consciousness, both individually and collectively, evolves according to the decisions we make with our free wills. It is this ever-evolving consciousness that is shaping the time field, which is in turn, determining our fate.
I wonder what Elvis would think of all this? Would he see that, according to the time field, rock and roll needed to be born exactly when it was? Maybe society needed to be affected by the sweeping influence of rock and roll. If it wasn't Elvis, it would have been someone else. What would he say about this? He'd probably just say, "Thankyuh, thankyuh ver much."



Sat., March 25 
15 Colbourne St, (off James St North)

Showtime is 8:30 pm

This will be an Earth Day celebration. We will honor Earth Hour by having no electricity in the room for the first set - so candles on the table, acoustic music, etc. For the second set we will plug in and rock the joint!

check out our new video: PROMO VIDEO

I am planning to start this discussion group because I feel we are entering an exciting, pivotal era and that people want to become more informed about what is 'really going on' in the world. One of the positive aspects of the dawning of the Trump era is that the alarm that people are feeling is causing them to 'wake up'. Everywhere I turn people are talking about things that usually take a back seat to other interests. Opinions abound. The more thoughtful and open-minded folk are keen to become more informed, relying less on the mainstream media for reliable information.

I feel it is important for us, at this critical juncture of human history, to avoid getting mired in the hopelessness and fear that is so prevalent. I am confident that humanity will continue to build on the progress that we've made over the past century. Despite the fear and negativity that is continually fed to us, I feel very positive about the way things are developing. In my opinion, the best way to remain positive is to be aware, vigilant and compassionate - to guard against agendas that threaten our humanity, and to support each other in community.

Here is a list of topics that I feel would make for lively, fertile discussion: 
- What and who does Trump represent? How worried should we be? 
- What is the current state of affairs worldwide? Some very informed people believe we are on the brink of world war 3. 
- How did we get here? What is the history of global geopolitics? What are some of the key factors that have contributed to events over the past several decades? What has happened behind the scenes? 
- What role do the banks and corporations play in world governance? 
- What have the establishment, the power brokers behind the Bush/Clinton/Obama regimes, been doing over the last several decades? Many of the most significant developments have been under-reported by the mainstream media.

We live in an era of 'information wars'. There is so much conflicting information floating around - it's hard to know what to believe. I find it useful to refer to highly informed, tried and trusted truth-tellers - journalists and scholars who are rarely given access to the mainstream media. Here is a list of people that I recommend, for starters:
Noam Chomsky
John Pilger
Tariq Ali
Catherine Austin Fitts 
Julian Assange
Edward Snowden

Here is a talk given recently by Noam Chomsky that offers a very good history lesson about American global dominance since the second world war: 

The first meeting of this discussion group will take place at our home, some time in mid-April. It is open to anyone. There is no cost involved. Snacks and non-alcoholic beverages will be provided. More specific info will follow in next month's newsletter.

Peace and love, Dennis.  


My book, Why Is Life?, has been released as an e-book, available for approximately $6 or less, from a list of online bookstores:
Apple i-Books, Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Sony Reader Store, Koby, Copia, Gardners, Baker & Taylor, eBookPie, eSentral, Scribd and PagePusher.
The book can be purchased at any of these outlets, searching with either the title or this ISBN number: 9781483515403
OR, just click on one of these links: 
New to e-books?
Click this link for a wikipedia article about e-books:
If this is the first time you've bought an e-book, you may need to download an app - the most popular ones are from Amazon and are free to download. You can read an e-book on your computer, laptop or an e-book device like a Kindle (Amazon) or an I-Book or I-Pad (Apple). For an article comparing them, click here:

To download a Kindle app for any reading device including Apple products, click here:

To read a variety of reviews of this book, click here and then, once in the website, click 'reviews':  
Aten Publishing, 40 Nicklin Crescent, Guelph, Ontario N1H 5E9 Canada
Sent by dgomo@golden.net in collaboration with
Constant Contact